U.S. Judicial System

Vaughn's Summaries logo

Politics Summaries

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Summary

Here is a summary list of current United States Supreme Court Justices, along with several facts and evaluations. The Associate Justices are ranked by Qualifications, and Conservative vs. Liberal Bias. A recent court decision is discussed.

Wretched 2008 Decisions -- Wretched 2011 Decisions

.
Biographical Facts
2008 Politics

Last Name

First Name

Religion
State
Born
Appointed
Bias
Segal-Cover
6-25-08
Execute
Child
Rapists?
6-26-08
Right to Bear Arms?
Sworn
President
C vs. L
Score
Qual.
1

Roberts

John

Cath.

 NY

1955

2005

Bush 2

Con.3

.12

.97

Yes

Yes

2

Scalia

Antonin

Cath.

NJ

1936

1986

Reagan

Con.1

.00

1

Yes

Yes

3

Alito

Samuel

Cath.

 NJ

1950

2006

Bush 2

Con.2

.10

.81

Yes

Yes

4

Thomas

Clarence

Cath.

GA
1948
1991
Bush 1

Con.4

.16

.42

Yes

Yes

5

Stevens

John Paul

Protes.

IL

1920

1975

Ford

Swing
.25

.96

No

No

6

Souter

David H.

Episco.

MA

1939

1990
Bush 1

Lib.4

.33

.77

No

No

7

Kennedy

Anthony

Cath.

CA

1936

1988

Reagan

Lib.3

.36

.89

No

Yes

8

Breyer

Stephen

Jewish

CA

1938

1994

Clinton

Lib.2

.48

.55

No

No

9

Ginsberg

Ruth Bader

Jewish

 NY

1933

1993

Clinton

Lib.1

.68

1

No

No

20

80

88 - 768

50

40

50

50

60

50

50

50

50

50

There will be no Protestants on the Supreme Court, after Kagen is confirmed - the erosion of Protestantism.

According to the
Segal-Cover Score,
1. Justices Ginsberg and Scalia are the most qualified justices.
2. Justice Thomas is unquestionably the least qualified justice.
3. Justice Ginsberg is the most LIBERAL of the justices.
4. Justice Scalia is the most CONSERVATIVE justice.
5. Justice Stevens has the highest seniority on the court. He is frequently a swing voter.
6. Justices Kennedy and Souter can be swing voters, as well.
7. Justices Roberts and Alito are the Johnny-come-latelys.


A Most Recent Travesty Against "Children Victims"

On June 25, 2008, the court gave a pass to the most despicable human beings on earth.
After reading this most recent decision, I am no longer a Liberal. I am now a Conservative. I'm 64.
When children don't matter, you are going to have trouble with me.

In the words of dissenting Justice Scalia, "It means the death penalty would be barred,
no matter how young the child,
no matter how many times the child is raped,
no matter how many children the perpetrator rapes,
no matter how sadistic the crime,
no matter how much physical or psychological trauma is inflicted, and
no matter how heinous the perpetrator's prior criminal record may be."


Louisiana had provided for the death penalty for first-time offenders.
Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas had provided for the death penalty for second offenders.
As of yesterday, June 25, 2008, these laws have been overturned.
Alabama, Colorado, Idaho, Mississippi, Missouri and Washington had been leaning toward passing such a law.

The federal government authorizes the death penalty for treason, espionage, kidnapping and aircraft hijacking.
But not for the heinous, depraved crime of multiple vicious rapes of multiple toddlers? Unbelievable.
The children have no voice. How can this be?

The Supreme Court is broken. Too much authority can go to judges' heads.
Idiocy has once again been canonized. By one vote. One bad day for one person. It has changed history.
We must now rely upon prison inmates to provide appropriate justice for these disgusting offenders.




The Two Theories Currently Being Espoused


With A Capital Crime Law:
There will be fewer child victims, but more of them will be killed. (previous state laws which were overturned)
There will be fewer offenses committed.


Without A Capital Crime Law:
There will be more child victims, but fewer of them will be killed. (yesterday's decision)
There will be more offenses committed.


As Linda Richman used to say, "Talk amongst yourselves."

20

740 - 768


.
On the Other Hand - 2011
The Conservative Judges Are Destroying the Country
with pro-corporate decisions against the people.

.
Biographical Facts
2011 Politics

Last Name

First Name

Religion
State
Born
Appointed
Bias
Segal-Cover
Bad
Vote
#1
Bad
Vote
#2
Sworn
President
C vs. L
Score
Qual.
1

Roberts

John

Cath.

 NY

1955

2005

Bush 2

Con.3

.12

.97

Yes

Yes

2

Scalia

Antonin

Cath.

 NJ

1936

1986

Reagan

Con.1

.00

1

Yes

Yes

3

Alito

Samuel

Cath.

 NJ

1950

2006

Bush 2

Con.2

.10

.81

Yes

Yes

4

Thomas

Clarence

Cath.

GA
1948
1991
Bush 1

Con.4

.16

.42

Yes

Yes

5

Kennedy

Anthony

Cath.

 CA

1936

1988

Reagan

Swing

.36

.89

?
?
6

Breyer

Stephen

Jewish

 CA

1938

1994

Clinton

Lib.4

.48

.55

No

No

7

Ginsberg

Ruth B.

Jewish

 NY

1933

1993

Clinton

Lib.3

.68

1

No

No

8

Kagan

Elena

Jewish

MA

1960

2010

Obama

Lib.2

.73

.73

No

No

9

Sotomayer

Sonia

Cath.

NY

1954

 2009

Obama

Lib.1

.78

.81

No

No

ZERO representation for Protestants
Are we to be ruled by conservative Catholics? Good luck with birth control issues, child-molesting priests, etc.
Judge Thomas has been criticized for being so silent - he is well aware of the adage about "removing all doubt".

20

80

88 - 768

50

40

50

50

60

50

50

50

50

50




top of page






Vaughn's Summaries
©2008-2011 Vaughn Aubuchon ... All Rights Reserved
www.vaughns-1-pagers.com


This Vaughns U.S. Supreme Court Justices Summary web page updated on 2011-09-17.